Strategy
The Orthogramic metamodel is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) license, ensuring that it remains open, collaborative, and widely accessible.
Introduction
The Strategy domain in Orthogramic defines your organization’s long-term vision, goals, and priorities, guiding every aspect of business operations. This domain is closely linked to other business architecture elements like Capabilities, Value Streams, and Stakeholders, ensuring that strategies are effectively aligned with the organization's capabilities and market demands. Orthogramic enables you to monitor and adjust strategies in real-time, providing the agility needed to stay competitive and respond to changing business conditions. Discover how the Strategy domain helps you drive focused and successful execution across your organization.
What is a Strategy in Orthogramic?
In Orthogramic, a Strategy represents the foundational blueprint that guides an organization’s direction, defining goals and objectives that drive the alignment of various business components. Unlike a traditional BIZBOK Strategy, which often emphasizes a structured, documentation-heavy approach, Orthogramic’s Strategy is dynamic, interactive, and closely integrated with other business architecture domains. This integration ensures that an organization's Strategy is not only well-documented but also actively managed and adaptable to changing business environments.
Orthogramic’s Strategy domain goes beyond static documentation by emphasizing real-time alignment with business capabilities, processes, stakeholders, and value streams. Strategies in Orthogramic are closely tied to attributes, elements, and sub-elements, allowing organizations to break down high-level objectives into actionable components that are linked to specific business functions. This interconnectedness provides a comprehensive view of how a Strategy influences—and is influenced by—various aspects of the organization. For example, Orthogramic allows users to link a strategic objective to specific capabilities, value streams, and stakeholder roles, creating a clear path from strategy formulation to execution. This level of detail and integration is a key differentiator from BIZBOK’s more rigid framework.
One of the main differences between Orthogramic and BIZBOK is the level of automation and dynamic adaptability embedded in the Strategy domain. BIZBOK often relies on manual processes and periodic updates to keep strategic documents current, which can be a time-consuming and resource-intensive effort. In contrast, Orthogramic employs automation, data analytics, and AI to continuously monitor the alignment of Strategies with other business architecture domains. This automation provides real-time insights, allowing organizations to quickly adjust their strategic direction as internal conditions or external market factors evolve. The platform’s AI capabilities can predict potential shifts in the relevance or effectiveness of a Strategy, empowering organizations to take proactive measures.
Orthogramic also emphasizes a more democratized approach to Strategy management compared to BIZBOK. Traditional BIZBOK strategies are often curated and maintained by specialized business architects or executive stakeholders, limiting broader organizational engagement. Orthogramic, on the other hand, is designed to involve a wider range of roles and stakeholders. Its user-friendly interface and integrated communication tools allow individuals from various departments—such as HR, operations, and finance—to contribute to the formulation and refinement of a Strategy. This inclusivity fosters a culture of shared ownership and collaboration, ensuring that Strategies are not only top-down mandates but are reflective of the entire organization’s perspective.
Another distinction lies in how performance metrics are integrated into Strategy management. In BIZBOK, performance measurement is often treated as a supplementary task, separate from the core strategic process. Orthogramic integrates performance as a core component of the Strategy domain, embedding relevant KPIs and metrics directly into strategic objectives. This allows users to track the effectiveness of a Strategy in real-time, offering immediate feedback on progress and areas that require adjustment. The inclusion of these metrics within the Strategy domain enables organizations to continuously refine their approach, making Strategy a living, evolving aspect of business architecture rather than a static document.
Furthermore, Orthogramic’s Strategy domain is designed to anticipate and accommodate changes in the business landscape. Using data-driven insights, the platform allows for rapid scenario analysis and strategic planning. Organizations can model different scenarios to see how various strategies might perform under changing market conditions, competitor actions, or internal adjustments. This scenario-based analysis enables a more agile response to uncertainty, making Orthogramic’s Strategy domain a powerful tool for navigating complex environments.
The relationships between Business Architecture Domains, Attributes, Elements, and Sub-Elements in Orthogramic further differentiate its approach to Strategy. Each Strategy is directly linked to other domains, such as Capabilities, Value Streams, and Stakeholders, forming a cohesive network of interdependencies. This interconnected model allows organizations to visualize how a change in Strategy impacts various elements, ensuring that adjustments are consistent and aligned across the organization. BIZBOK’s traditional approach often segments these relationships, requiring separate documentation and manual effort to ensure alignment, which can lead to fragmentation and inconsistencies.
In summary, a Strategy in Orthogramic is not just a static document outlining goals and objectives; it is a dynamic, integrated framework that connects all elements of business architecture. Unlike BIZBOK, which emphasizes a structured, documentation-heavy process, Orthogramic’s Strategy domain focuses on agility, real-time data, and collaboration. This modern, outcome-oriented approach allows organizations to adapt quickly to change while maintaining a clear focus on strategic objectives. By embedding performance metrics, leveraging automation, and fostering inclusive engagement, Orthogramic empowers organizations to make Strategy a continuous and adaptive process that drives long-term success.
Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements
To understand the Relationship of Domain, Attributes, Elements and Sub-Elements, see: Domain Attributes & Elements
Strategy attributes
Domain | Attribute | Description | Example |
strategy | Title | The name or title of the Strategy | Predictive Track Maintenance Program |
strategy | Description | A detailed explanation of what the Strategy entails | Implementation of AI-powered track defect prediction system across Class I networks |
strategy | Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the Strategy within the Organization | Reduce track-related accidents by 35% through early defect detection |
strategy | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the Strategy | Director of Track Technology Innovation |
strategy | orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) to which the Strategy is most closely linked. |
|
strategy | Objectives | Specific measurable targets to achieve strategic goals | Deploy sensors on 85% of mainline track by 2026 |
strategy | Key Activities | Critical actions necessary to implement the Strategy | Sensor installation, data integration, predictive model development |
strategy | Resources | Resources allocated for the Strategy implementation | $145M budget, 23 technical staff, 4 AI systems |
strategy | Timeline | The timeline for achieving the Strategy | 36 months: 2024-2026 |
strategy | Performance Indicators | Metrics used to measure the success of the Strategy | Defect prediction accuracy: 92%, False positive rate: <3% |
strategy | Dependencies | Other strategies Initiatives or processes that the Strategy depends on | Track geometry measurement systems, weather monitoring network |
strategy | Related Strategies | Strategies that are related or linked to this Strategy | Digital Track Inspection Program, Rail Stress Monitoring |
strategy | Risks | Potential risks associated with the Strategy and its implementation | Sensor reliability in extreme weather, data quality issues |
strategy | Improvement Opportunities | Areas where the Strategy can be enhanced or improved | Expand to Class II railroads, integrate with PTC systems |
strategy | Strategic Alignment | How the Strategy aligns with the Organizations strategic goals and objectives | Directly supports 25% accident reduction goal |
strategy | Business Objective | A specific measurable goal that a company aims to achieve to support its overall Strategy | Reduce unplanned track maintenance by 40% |
strategy | Parent | A high-level Strategy that provides overarching principles or rules guiding business operations | FRA Technology Modernization Plan |
strategy | Child | A specific Strategy that falls under a broader parent Policy | Rail Temperature Monitoring Strategy |
Strategy objective Element
Element | Sub-Element | Description | Example |
strategicObjective | Title | The name or title of the strategic objective | Zero Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Accidents |
strategicObjective | Description | A detailed explanation of what the strategic objective entails | Eliminate all accidents at highway-rail grade crossings through technology and education |
strategicObjective | Purpose | The intended purpose or function of the strategic objective | Protect public safety at rail crossings |
strategicObjective | Owner | The individual or team responsible for the strategic objective | Grade Crossing Safety Director |
strategicObjective | orgUnitTitle | The Organization unit(s) to which the strategic objective is aligned | Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Division |
strategicObjective | Metrics | The measurable indicators used to assess the success of the objective | Accidents per million train-miles: 2.8, Crossing signal compliance: 99.2% |
strategicObjective | Timeline | The timeframe within which the strategic objective should be achieved | 5-year implementation: 2024-2028 |
strategicObjective | Stakeholders | The Stakeholders involved or affected by the strategic objective | Railroads, State DOTs, Local communities |
Related content
© Orthogramic 2024