| Table of Contents | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Introduction
The Review process ensures that all changes to the business architecture domain data are thoroughly vetted and validated before becoming part of the official record. This process is crucial for maintaining the integrity and accuracy of your organization's data. Below is a step-by-step guide on how to use the process effectively.
It uses a structured workflow involving multiple roles within your organization. Each change submitted to the system is automatically queued for review and approval. This ensures that data modifications are evaluated by the appropriate personnel before they are finalized.
The process
Roles Involved
Review Users
Users in the same or higher business unit within the organizational hierarchy can review changes made by other users.
Review users are responsible for ensuring that the changes made align with organizational standards and policies.
...
After a change has been reviewed, it must be approved by an admin user.
See Admin > Review and Approvals Adminadmin for a description of administering reviews and approvals.
Review Process
Changes Awaiting Review
Any changes made to the business architecture domain data will automatically be added to the "Changes Awaiting Review" queue. Review users will be notified of pending reviews.Review Options
Reject Review: If the changes do not meet the necessary criteria or standards, the reviewer can reject the review, providing feedback for improvement.
Accept Change: If the changes are satisfactory, the reviewer can accept them, moving the changes forward in the process.
Reviews
...
This illustrates an business architecture domain data changes requiring review.
Changes awaiting review
...
This illustrates the interface where users can see a list of changes that are currently waiting to be reviewed. Each entry typically includes details such as the date, the type of change, and the user who submitted it. The image emphasizes the organized queue system, ensuring that all changes are systematically reviewed by appropriate personnel.
Reject review
...
This illustrates the option for a reviewer to reject a submitted change. It typically includes a dialog box or form where the reviewer can provide feedback or reasons for the rejection, ensuring that the submitter understands what needs to be improved.
Accept change
...
This illustrates option where a reviewer can accept a change. Upon acceptance, the change progresses to the next stage in the approval process. The image may highlight how the interface confirms the acceptance and informs the user of the next steps.