| Table of Contents | ||
|---|---|---|
|
...
Quality assessment criteria
Category | Subcategory | Description | Yes/No |
Structure and Content | Quality Manual | Included and comprehensive | |
Quality Policy and Objectives | Clearly stated | ||
Procedures and Work Instructions | Detailed and complete | ||
Control of Documented Information | Approval | Document approved for use | |
Review and Update | Regularly reviewed and updated | ||
Identification and Distribution | Clearly identified and appropriately distributed | ||
Accessibility and Storage | Accessibility | Easily accessible to relevant personnel | |
Storage and Protection | Properly stored and protected | ||
Retention and Disposal | Retention | Retained for required period | |
Disposal | Proper disposal procedures in place | ||
Accuracy and Currency | Accuracy | Accurate and error-free | |
Currency | Up-to-date with recent changes | ||
Compliance | Regulatory Requirements | Compliant with relevant regulations |
...
The normalised criteria scores serve as inputs for Document Weighting, ensuring the weighted score computation remains consistent across document evaluations.
By normalising scores before weighting, the document evaluation process maintains robustness, preventing bias due to variations in document characteristics.
Example
Document | Raw Score (Criterion A) | Normalised Score (Min-Max) |
|---|---|---|
Doc 1 | 30 | 0.25 |
Doc 2 | 50 | 0.75 |
Doc 3 | 40 | 0.50 |
After normalisation, these values are used in the final document weighting calculations, ensuring consistent assessment criteria.
Conclusion
By incorporating normalisation into Document Criteria Analysis, Orthogramic ensures a structured and unbiased document evaluation process.
...