Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents
stylenone

Introduction

To evaluate business architecture data effectively, business users follow a structured rating process for each Business Architecture domain within their document. The process involves assessing three key aspects: relevance, quality, and quantity.

How it works

  1. Relevance: Users determine how closely the domain data aligns with the Organization's strategic goals. Ratings range from "Very High" (direct alignment) to "Very Low" (minimal support), with an option for "Incomplete" if no relevant data exists.

  2. Quality: This assesses the documentation's adherence to industry standards, specifically ISO 9001 for documents. Ratings span from "Very High" (meets/exceeds Level 5 standards) to "Very Low" (meets Level 1 standards), with "Incomplete" indicating non-compliance with any standard. For details, see: https://orthogramic.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OUG/pages/edit-v2/233078785?draftShareId=13f5f7a2-d3bb-4d7d-bee5-6647f2aeed12#Assessing-document-quality-in-terms-of-ISO-9001

  3. Quantity: Users evaluate the comprehensiveness of the documentation against ISO 9001 for documents requirements. The scale goes from "Very High" (surpassing Level 5 requirements) to "Very Low" (meeting Level 1 requirements), with "Incomplete" for insufficient documentation.

By systematically rating each domain, users ensure a thorough and objective evaluation of how well their business architecture data supports strategic goals and meets documentation standards. This structured approach helps in identifying strengths and areas for improvement, ultimately aiding in more informed decision-making.

Example document criteria analysis

This is an example of advanced criteria analysis during document editing.

...

Assessing document quality in terms of ISO 9001

Review Structure and Content

...

  1. Regulatory Requirements: Ensure the document complies with relevant regulatory and statutory requirements.

Example assessment criteria

Category

Subcategory

Description

Yes/No

Structure and Content

Quality Manual

Included and comprehensive

Quality Policy and Objectives

Clearly stated

Procedures and Work Instructions

Detailed and complete

Control of Documented Information

Approval

Document approved for use

Review and Update

Regularly reviewed and updated

Identification and Distribution

Clearly identified and appropriately distributed

Accessibility and Storage

Accessibility

Easily accessible to relevant personnel

Storage and Protection

Properly stored and protected

Retention and Disposal

Retention

Retained for required period

Disposal

Proper disposal procedures in place

Accuracy and Currency

Accuracy

Accurate and error-free

Currency

Up-to-date with recent changes

Compliance

Regulatory Requirements

Compliant with relevant regulations

...